(8432) 66-55-52, 66-03-93


Immigration Lawyers - What Are They Good For?

Immigration Lawyers - What Are They Good For?

Once I checked my inbox this morning I discovered an important e mail from a corporation of immigration professionals which I belong to.

In actual fact, this e mail is so essential to my capacity to practice immigration law that I forwarded it to all of my employees, saved it in our firm's electronic address book, and printed it for inclusion in the binder that sits on my desk proper by my telephone.

Yet, the reality is that this electronic mail makes me really feel like I'm a silent associate in a little bit of a deception being perpetrated on the public by CIC. Let me explain.

Residentship and Immigration Canada clearly takes great public pride within the amount of knowledge and assets it gives to the general public via its website and call centre. CIC boasts that "All the varieties and data that it is advisable apply for a visa are available totally free on this website."

Therefore, it is no surprise that within the website's FAQ, the reply to the query: "Do I need an immigration representative to help me apply?" is a "no."

The general public is told that "The Government of Canada treats everyone equally, whether or not they use a representative or not."

Will your case be processed more shortly in the event you hire a consultant? CIC advises that "When you choose to hire a representative, your application won't be given particular attention by the immigration officer."

Is this really true? Is all the data you want really out there? Do you need a lawyer? Would it make any distinction if you have one? Put one other means: are people who find themselves using attorneys and consultants to deal with their immigration functions just throwing away their cash?

I hate answering these questions since doing other folks's immigration work is how I make my living. Folks could be justified in being sceptical about my answers to these questions.

But the fact is "all the data you need" is just not really on the market and, yes, in many cases a lawyer or guide's involvement can spell the distinction between success, delay, or abject failure.

The information at cic.gc.ca is normal in nature and can't possibly contemplate the infinite factual situations that candidates may present when applying. Furthermore, the brokers at the call centre can not and https://www.behance.net/gallery/75621113/Atlanta-Immigration-Attorney do not provide callers with authorized advice. It is merely not in their mandate to do so. Instead, they offer "normal information on the CIC lines of business... provide case specific info, and settle for orders for CIC publications and software kits."

In other words, they can not tell you what you 'should' do when confronted with obstacles or strategic decisions to make.

Also, in the event you encounter an issue that needs to be escalated, which just isn't unusual, you will see that treasured little data on the CIC website as to where to direct your criticism or question.

Not so with immigration professionals.

The e-mail I received this morning is an replace of CIC's protocol on how immigration professionals should direct their queries. The correspondence comprises the e-mail address for every Canadian visa post abroad and the names and e-mail addresses of the immigration program managers at each of these offices. It tells us how, and to whom, to direct case-specific enquiries to the Case Management Branch in Ottawa and when and tips on how to observe up if we don't receive a timely reply. It provides instructions on the right way to direct communications regarding high quality of service complaints, conditions involving possible misconduct or malfeasance of immigration officers, procedures, operational and choice policy, and processing occasions and levels.

To my information, this information isn't shared with members of the public. CIC's failure to publicise this information doesn't mirror preferential remedy for individuals who are represented. Instead, it is simply an acknowledgement that immigration professionals do, and have at all times, performed a significant role in making an overburdened and below-resourced program function in any respect (if not perform well).

Sharing this information with the public would end in an avalanche of correspondence being directed at senior officers who're spread out so thinly that they may by no means get any other work done.

It is true that, except in exceptional and deserving cases, hiring a lawyer or consultant cannot get an utility moved from the back of the line to the entrance of the line. Also, an officer will not approve an applicant who is not qualified just because she or he is represented. Nonetheless, it is usually true that an honest and experienced consultant will not clog up the system by submitting an software that merely won't fly.